Building Bigger And Stronger Rugby Players - The Sydney University Experiment

It is widely acknowledged that the average bodymuscle mass is a natural and not unintended
weight of rugby players has increasedby-product of such training.Another distinctive
considerably over recent years. Less recognised isfeature of Martin Harland's rugby training regimen
the extent to which modern defensive alignmentsis his requirement that backs undertake the same
and strategies have transformed rugby matchesrigorous basic strength routines as forwards. Many
into contests of attrition where bigger andstrength and conditioning coaches reserve the
stronger teams tend to wear down their smallerheavy "grunt" work for forwards, or even restrict
and physically weaker opponents over the courseit to the tight five.Exposing backs to very serious
of a game. Perhaps the most notable change hasweight training has produced a quite extraordinary
been the increased importance of physicaloutcome at Sydney University, as evidenced by
dominance in the backline.Responding to this,comparing the body weights of their forwards
Sydney University's rugby club has been able toand backs with those of the Wallabies and the
demonstrate that with the right combination offour Australian Super 14 franchises, the ACT
coach and infrastructure, it is possible to fastBrumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds and
track the physical development of players outsideWestern Force.Not surprisingly, the University's
a professional playing environment. In fact within ayoung forwards are outweighed by each of the
couple of seasons these players are able tofive professional squads, 105.3 kilograms
achieve a body mass comparable to that ofcompared to 109.1 to 111.1 kilograms. However, in
seasoned professionals together with a solidthe backs the situation is reversed with the
foundation of basic strength.In late May, SydneyUniversity players averaging 95.1 kilograms as
University announced its team for the first roundopposed to 90.9 to 92.9 kilograms. Thus the
of the Tooheys New Cup, the premierSydney University backs outweigh Australia's
competition in Sydney club rugby. All of thenational and provincial squads by between 2.2 and
fifteen players are past or current students who4.2 kilograms per man.If we look at the difference
had been developed through the Club's Colts andin body weight between backs and forwards it
lower grade teams. None of them are paid tocan be seen that for Sydney University it
play for the Club, although the eleven who are stillaverages 10.2 kilograms, against 16.2 to 19.4
students receive modest scholarship assistance.kilograms for Australia's professional squads, a
Only three of the players are on professionalvery substantial difference.The Sydney University
contracts.It is instructive to compare their bodyexperiment seems to be providing clear evidence
weight and age profiles with those of squadsthat the body weight of rugby backs can be
from four major rugby countries, those ofdramatically increased through serious weight
Australia, England, New Zealand and South Africa.training, but the question arises as to whether this
The average weight of the international teamshas benefits in terms of playing performance.One
varies from 101.2 to 102.9 kilograms while theiranswer is that the other strength-oriented football
average age is from 25.5 to 27.2 years.code, American football, has traditionally used
Comparative figures for the Sydney Universitytraining methods similar to those of Martin Harland.
team are 100.5 kilograms and 22.5 years.It can beAll players, whether linemen or running backs, are
seen that the part-time, unpaid Sydney Universityrequired to do heavy gym work. No one would
players, though three to five years younger,seriously suggest that their quick players have
weigh only a couple of kilograms less than theinferior dynamic abilities to rugby players.Another
world's best players. This is quite extraordinary asjustification for building heavier backs with superior
normally a much greater weight disparity wouldleg drive lies in the already mentioned importance
be expected.For the past three years Sydneyof physical dominance in the rugby backline. With
University Football Club has been operating an Elitethe modern emphasis on structure and
Development Squad (EDS) program for its topcoordination in defensive alignments, bigger and
grade and colts players. Utilising one of the beststronger backs are better able to continually repel
equipped gymnasiums in Australian rugby, playersopposition attacks and also over the course of a
train for eleven months of the year andgame are likely to create physical and mental
undertake four weights sessions per weekfatigue in their counterparts.Having achieved a
off-season and a lesser number while playing.Thestrong foundation of basic strength and greater
program's strength and conditioning componentsbody mass, Martin Harland is then able to focus
have been devised and administered by Martinon speed and explosiveness in his players. It is
Harland, a sports scientist who has previouslyclear that the Sydney University approach yields
worked with professional rugby league, Australianresults on the playing field. 2005 was the Club's
football and basketball teams. His programs formost successful year, winning the Sydney Club
rugby players place a high degree of emphasis onChampionship, the First Grade Premiership and
basic strength development and rugby-specificfour lower grade Premierships.Even more
fitness. A distinguishing feature of his approach isimportantly, players who graduate from such a
a concentration on heavy lower body workprogram are much better equipped to withstand
through exercises such as squats, deadlifts andthe rigours of modern rugby.Bruce Ross is CEO
cleans. In addition, both backs and forwards makeof MyoQuip, manufacturers of variable-resistance
intensive use of the MyoQuip ScrumTruk, astrength machines including the HipneeFlex and
rugby-specific apparatus that targets the largeHipneeThrust, and the rugby-specific ScrumTruk
mass leg extensor muscles, specifically the glutealand JumpTruk. MyoQuip exports worldwide from
and quadriceps groups. Hypertrophy or increasedAustralia.