You Have Too Much Hair?

The quest for permanent hair removal goes backresearchers were experimenting with electrical
millenia; archeologist say that men shaved as farmethods of hair removal as far back as the
back as 20 thousand years ago, using sharpenedAmerican Civil War era. The first workable
rocks and shells. Societies all around the world useelectrolysis machine was invented by St. Louis
diverse hair removal methods, from sugaring toophthalmologist Charles Michel, who in published
caustic depilatory creams. However, the hairresults of permanent hair removal with treatment
eventually grows back and the procedure mustby a battery-powered electrified needle in 1875.
be repeated endlessly.He had been using his device to treat ingrown
The oldest method of permanent hair removal iseyelashes since 1869. This DC-current powered
electrolysis. It works as advertised for mostmethod is referred to as electrolysis or galvanic
consumers if done correctly, but it requireselectrolysis because a chemical reaction in the hair
training and skill by the operator. A hair-thin probefollicle causes formation of sodium hydroxide,
is inserted into each hair follicle, and low-voltagewhich damages the follicle. The chemical reaction is
electricity is applied, causing localized damage toas follows : NaCl (salt) H2O (water) direct current
the follicle and preventing hair regrowth. Proper= NaOH (sodium hydroxide) Cl (chlorine) H
insertion of the probe follows the natural opening(hydrogen).
of the follicle and does not penetrate the skin.Subsequent improvements included a machine
This method of hair removal has a proven trackusing multiple needles, invented by Paul Kree in
record of more than 125 years, and most studies1916; and the use of AC current, called diathermy,
show 90%-93% customer satisfaction with thewhich causes direct thermal injury to the hair
results. However, it can be expensive if largefollicle, reported in medical literature in 1924 by Dr.
areas are to be treated, and waiting while aHenri Bordier. The latter method is also referred
technician attends to each individual hair in turn canto as thermolysis, short-wave, high-frequency,
be tedious. It can be moderately painful. If theand radiofrequency hair removal.
technician is unskilled, permanent scarring canMinor improvements continued through the 1930s
occur, and unsterilized equipment can spread skinand 1940s. In 1948, Arthur Hinkel and Henri St.
infections.Pierre received a patent in 1948 for a combination
The treatment may have to be repeated 3-4method they developed, and 20 years later
times, both to redo follicles which were notpublished "Electrolysis, Thermolysis and the Blend",
destroyed after one treatment, and to catchwhich described their experiments with different
follicles which were not producing hairs at the timehair removal techniques. "Blend" refers to the fact
of treatment and thus went unnoticed. Hairthat blended methods often work better than
follicles are not always in an active growth phase;just one method alone.
however, after a year or so, most follicles willFurther improvements included incorporating
have been treated. Because a majority of hairtransistors and computerized controls, as well as
follicles are in a dormant, non-growth phase atinsulated probes and sterile disposable needles.
any given time, treatment must be repeated atHowever, despite attempts to automate
2-3 month intervals to catch them all.electrolysis equipment, the effectiveness and
The term "needle-free electrolysis" is sometimessafety of electrolysis is highly dependent on the
used to describe hair removal devices whichskill of the operator. Electrolysis professional
function by passing electric current down the hairorganizations exist and set standards for member
shaft to the follicle by a tweezer or a conductivecertification, but in many states, anyone is legally
patch. These systems are completely ineffective,permitted to offer electrolysis services. Therefor
as hair is a poor conductor of electricity.it is important for anyone seeking electrolysis to
Battery-operated home units are sold on atget references beforehand.
department stores, the Internet and on Ebay,Use of this hair removal method continued into
usually for around $20. The most popular brand isthe early part of the 20th century, when it was
One-Touch by Babyliss, though others are offeredbriefly eclipsed by X-ray hair removal, which was
as well. From personal experience, I can testifyadvertised as safe and painless. It should be noted
that these units do indeed work, but a lot ofthat people in this era displayed a generalized,
practice is necessary. Consumers who try thisdangerous lack of knowledge about the dangers
option should be aware that despite the detailedof radiation; shoe stores even featured x-ray
and quite adequate instructions accompanying themachines to aid in shoe fitting!
units, there is a learning curve, and many peopleAfter the X-ray fad ended consumers returned
have found that performing electrolysis onto electrolysis until the advent of effective laser
themselves is too difficult to be worth the trouble.treatment in the 1990's. These days, most hair
However, if you do decide to use this option, aremoval is done by laser, but electrolysis is still
pair of magnifying glasses and a good set ofuseful for isolated hairs, and for pale hair which
tweezers can make the procedure much easier.responds poorly to light-based treatment.
Electrolysis has a long history, and many